On Tue, Dec 08, 2009 at 09:05:40AM +0100, Koen Kooi wrote: > What's the rationale behind this change? And why do you comment it > when we have an scm that can track changes? > > regards, > > Koen
I had similar problem in xorg-7.5 branch. Few packages depending on "mesa" directly, I replaced all with virtual/libgl which is probably provided by all mesa variants (normal, -full, -dri, -xlib). Then we can use normal preference in all mesa recipes and select right variant with PREFERRED_PROVIDER in machine config, right? Can I merge those patches for depends on virtual/libgl? Whole mesa directory seems quite messy to me.. 4 generations of mesa recipes with own include files, 4 variants with not so bigg diff. But my mesa knowledge wrt all oe devices isn't strong enough to encourage me to cleanup it a bit (I'm glad that mesa-dri-7.6 works good with spitz and for om-gta02 we use mesa-dri_git with special glamo DRI patches from Thomas White's branch). -- uin:136542059 jid:[email protected] Jansa Martin sip:[email protected] JaMa _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
