2010/1/7 Graeme Gregory <[email protected]>: > On Thu, Jan 07, 2010 at 09:50:36AM +0100, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: >> 2010/1/7 Graeme Gregory <[email protected]>: >> > On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 11:09:10PM +0100, Rolf Leggewie wrote: >> >> allergic to COMPATIBLE_MACHINE for no particular reason). Bitbake can't >> >> do versioned depends and so we can't say that $bb2-$version does not >> >> compile with gcc less than 3.4.x, for example. Those are just two >> >> examples. XorA "solved" this in a hackish way with angsstrom.bbclass. >> >> >> > No he didnt and no its not a hack. Its a blacklist of packages that for >> > various reasons Angstrom NEVER wants built. >> >> Should we have such a blacklist per machine? >> My sheevaplug rungs angstrom, but as it has no display it has no need >> for an X server, nor for ide or pci or sata tools. >> > It follows the standard overide rules (or should do) so you should > be able to blacklist per machine. > > Of course you chose a bad example as I know quite a few people are using > the sheeva with usb displaylink adapters.
Ah ok, I don't know any of them, but let's stay on safe grounds and take pci or sata tools as an example ;-) FM > > Graeme > > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel > _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
