Dear Holger,
Am Sonntag, den 24.01.2010, 11:45 +0100 schrieb Holger Hans Peter Freyther: > On Tuesday 19 January 2010 10:57:38 Paul Menzel wrote: > > Am Samstag, den 09.01.2010, 18:55 +0100 schrieb Paul Menzel: > > > > > Could someone please commit this patch. > > two things. If you have a mail where 99.9% of text is quoted and only 0.1 > percent is new, you are doing it wrong. Please throw away stuff when quoting. Sorry, I will try to do so next time. Sometimes I am unsure about the correct way. My intention was, if someone already had deleted my old message s/he could still review my patch. > The second part... could you please resend the patch? I did. > When I look here[1] patchwork is getting your patch totally wrong... Actually it is almost correct in my opinion. What is displayed as the patch is the needed mbox format for `git am`. Only that on the Web there is always an extra line added and the items with UTF-8 bullets (•) were stripped. I will check that later, because the Patchwork git log mentioned something about UTF-8. What `pwclient get 1438` retrieves is not useful though. :( > This means this and all the > patches based on it are not in my new staging branch and I'm not able to > review them. Probably I will have to resend the others too. I will check later. On the other hand, I always attached my patches. But that does not fit your workflow does it? Thanks, Paul > [1] http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/1438/
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
_______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
