It is "revision" 8, not "release candidate" 8. If you look at
http://www.olsr.org/releases/0.5/ you'll notice they ALSO have things
labeled 0.5.6-rcN, but these all predate 0.5.6-rN. I think their
numbering scheme through 0.5.6 is horrible. It gets worse... Four days
after they posted 0.5.6-r8, they decided to break convention again and
posted 0.5.6-r8-2 (and not 0.5.6-r9 as you'd expect).
It is indeed unfortunate.
--Adam
Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote:
On Saturday 23 January 2010 00:22:37 Adam Wozniak wrote:
Sorry, I've tried and tried, but I can't get send-email to work (network
config settings which are completely out of my control). Please try
this attachment.
The upstream version number of "olsrd_0.5.6-r8" is a bit unfortunate. Is that
revision or release candidate 8? This also means that the generated OE package
will be something like olsrd-0.5.6-r8-rX".
In case it is the release version it is probably fine but just a little bit
awkward, in case of rc we would have a small problem.
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
