. > > Sorry about that. But i wasn't sure if you read the ml daily. So i put > you on the Cc. > > BTW, i would call the hint, that your commit broke[1] the baking of at > least glib-2.0 (which isn't that exotic) an 'information'. > > [1] I've rechecked this again with angstrom distro and hipox, > beagleboard, and x86 machine making a clean build of glib-2.0: > > rm -rf tmp.5 > bitbake glib-2.0 > > Steffen
For me it also build for both i686 (machine eee701) and beagleboard. key difference is probably that for me glib got build as part of console-image. Didn't try a solo build of glib. FM _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
