On Wed 10 Feb 2010 08:33 AM, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: > 2010/2/10 Ruud Althuizen <[email protected]>: > > On Wed 03 Feb 2010 12:16 PM, Ruud Althuizen wrote: > >> On Wed 03 Feb 2010 12:07 PM, Paul Menzel wrote: > >> > Am Mittwoch, den 03.02.2010, 11:48 +0100 schrieb Ruud Althuizen: > >> > > In the attached patches there is a machine config and kernel recipe > >> > > for the > >> > > LPC3250 based Embedded Artists development board. > >> > > > >> > > If you have any suggestions for the attached patches, please give them > >> > > so I > >> > > can fix it. > >> > > >> > Please attach them. ;-) > >> Ah, now I remember that mutt discards attachments when forwarding :/. > > So, it's been a week now. And not even an reply. Any chance of this getting > > into the dev tree? > > I just skimmed over it. > First impression is ok, and as this will not break anything else, I > have no problems getting it added. I just found out about the patch queue and that my patch is added[1]. The problem is though that I attached _patches_. Both patches are useless on their own. The new kernel recipe contains all the patches for the board to be able to boot.
1: http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/1541/ -- Kind regards, Ruud Althuizen
pgpfVzkqR9Z80.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
