On Tue, 2010-02-16 at 11:58 +0100, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: > Sounds quite nice. > Didn't study the class code, but it would be nice if within layer.conf > I could use a relative path, which then is turned into an absolute > path when the layer.conf file is read
This is what the LAYERDIR variable gives us. Having relative paths would lose all context outside the layer.conf file. We could hardcode a list of variables that needed to be processed and so on but LAYERDIR removes all that complexity whilst still letting you move things around. > That means layer.conf can become very standard wrt BBPATH etc. and you > can even move layers around. You should be able to do that with my proposal, the only file that would need changing is bblayers.conf, not the layers themselves. Cheers, Richard _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
