On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 8:32 AM, Adrian Alonso <[email protected]> wrote: > Signed-off-by: Adrian Alonso <[email protected]> > --- > conf/machine/include/tune-ppc440.inc | 2 +- > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/conf/machine/include/tune-ppc440.inc > b/conf/machine/include/tune-ppc440.inc > index feca186..0c41db4 100644 > --- a/conf/machine/include/tune-ppc440.inc > +++ b/conf/machine/include/tune-ppc440.inc > @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ > TARGET_CC_ARCH = "-mcpu=440" > BASE_PACKAGE_ARCH = "ppc440" > FEED_ARCH = "ppc440" > -PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS += "ppc440e" > +PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS += "ppc440 ppc440e"
I wonder why this would be needed, I would think that PACKAGE_ARCHS consists of PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS and PACKAGE_ARCH (which is default arch constructed from BASE_PACKAGE_ARCH) if that was the case then ppc440 would be added to supported archs list already but it seems there is a disconnect between PACKAGE_ARCH and PACKAGE_ARCHS I am not sure if it is deliberate or an oversight. If it is an oversight then it should be fixed in bitbake.conf and that would avoid this patch. > -- > 1.6.6 > > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel > _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
