2010/3/15 Ulf Samuelsson <[email protected]>: > Add checksums for: > 2.6.30-exp.2.patch.bz2 > u-boot-2009.11.tar.bz2 > > Signed-off-by: Ulf Samuelsson <[email protected]> > --- > conf/checksums.ini | 8 ++++++++ > 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/conf/checksums.ini b/conf/checksums.ini > index 70346bf..ba3b697 100644 > --- a/conf/checksums.ini > +++ b/conf/checksums.ini > @@ -74,6 +74,10 @@ > sha256=7a960180e7873b1bdb522e76b0423b5c2c1b8efe1d30d7ca80c41eb97d822b2d > md5=f13ab353b11329ce3d605b6f40e77fa6 > sha256=41991e8aa2e5fe8e5dfd47b1e5c446fa03c3ee96a5eae54fd6ec15d1d9afef30 > > +[ftp://www.at91.com/pub/buildroot/2.6.30-exp.2.patch.bz2] > +md5=770c7a2bfb925111a8c0e0d4c8c4764e > +sha256=58894965b253eae0c4caacedc3463cf186c18431ca0d71b767a3b36aa40ec388 > + > [http://maxim.org.za/AT91RM9200/2.6/2.6.31-at91.patch.gz] > md5=bf420f0340e30b0a2c42b2b36d0b2577 > sha256=738b88daa31e1a033646900813a5f1ce40ba21e2836500fd848a984565f27584 > @@ -27022,6 +27026,10 @@ > sha256=b0037cf21b67779ef5a0c585b32e46bde3b78df889484c78bb4318c9b448f560 > md5=cd4788ea1c6ac4f9b100b888a1063a6b > sha256=858fd04efd5b98e99fd1a074998b1a8ac5fbd07b176de1d20d8eb148492d949d > > +[ftp://ftp.denx.de/pub/u-boot/u-boot-2009.11.tar.bz2] > +md5=d94700614225f53c853dfe714eb5fa47 > +sha256=066615314fc90a314823ac975ca2a525a51fdad41802f4088a3a21ce073e8de6 > + > [http://linux.omap.com/pub/bootloader/2430sdp/source/u-boot-SEP1106.tar.gz] > md5=49c07dec9e1be69fd01d46f47ec03731 > sha256=a090786113b02647413ebc15888af269f2e6d50f73cbb94b0619cc1702911dae > -- > 1.6.0.2
Isn't nowadays the preferred policy to have the checksums in the recipe? If so, shouldn't we stop adding checksums to the ini file? Frans _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
