On Monday 15 March 2010 14:53:44 Mike Westerhof wrote: Dear Mike,
> Sigh. > > I really don't think this recipe is worthy of this much controversy. > It's essential (hence the name) for certain very small NAS devices. > > I fail to see how its presence is impacting others -- if you don't like > it, don't use it. Simple. See. This is not the point of liking or not liking a given recipe. I don't like the fact that this recipe is not maintained for years and has the possibility of damaging the reputation of distros built with OE. I assume even users of SlugOS do not like if their device gets owned via known and circulating exploits? It would be nice if we could establish a shared responsibility for maintaining software that listens on network ports and is handling multimedia content (the two kind of things most likely to be suffering flaws). I don't think it is that difficult. If there is a remote hole and exploits are floating around, upgrade the recipe? anyway, you don't have the time.. _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
