On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 03:46:13PM +0100, Antonio Ospite wrote: > On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 15:24:23 +0100 > Martin Jansa <[email protected]> wrote: > > [...] > > --- a/classes/oestats-client.bbclass > > +++ b/classes/oestats-client.bbclass > > @@ -9,6 +9,8 @@ > > # OESTATS_BUILDER = "some_nickname" > > # > > > > +inherit metadata_scm > > + > > Hi Martin, this makes sense indeed, but can you please explain if/why my > previous patch[1] is not complete? In other words can oestats-client > be used without base.bbclass? Or is that "just" to make the inheritance > explicit? > > Thanks, > Antonio > > [1] > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel/2010-March/018675.html
Hi Antonio, ah, sorry I overlooked your patch in ML, for me your patch is as good as mine and maybe better. I just walk into the same issue today when RP sent me patch fixing event.data availability for oestats-client with bitbake master (before I had 2 constants there to work-arround this issue). Regards, -- uin:136542059 jid:[email protected] Jansa Martin sip:[email protected] JaMa _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
