On Wed, 2010-03-31 at 10:25 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 4:28 AM, Richard Purdie <[email protected]> wrote: > > To illustrate the kind of thing I mean, have a look at this commit: > > > > http://git.openembedded.net/cgit.cgi/openembedded/commit/?h=rpurdie/work-in-progress&id=35481122d7e484fb740ad9440fb4c70cb01de48f > > > > in one place you removed DEPENDS that may not be correct. Because > DEPENDS get overwritten in gcc-cross-initial.inc
Ah, I messed up the commits. That bit should have been in the previous commit where it makes more sense: http://git.openembedded.net/cgit.cgi/openembedded/commit/?h=rpurdie/work-in-progress&id=ec04a8b72958e616da55e30ec1d731424d77ed9d > > The nice thing about this is all of a sudden we have all the flags in > > the same place and it becomes obvious if something is wrong. There are a > > few things that raise an eyebrow there. It also becomes easier to > > abstract some of the gcc-X.Y.Z.inc data into a common include file > > (maybe a gcc-4.3.X.inc for example). > > I this this is a good idea. We could even capture some bugs like in > some recipes we use EXTRA_OECONF_BASE += and in some EXTRA_OECONF_BASE > = Exactly the kind of thing I'd like to catch! > > Does anyone else fancy helping trying to clean this mess up. I'm happy > > to review some cleanup patches? > > I plan to do some of this restructuring when I am back from my time > off in end of april. Great, any help would be welcome with this kind of thing :) Cheers Richard _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
