On Tue, 2010-04-13 at 00:19 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: > OK, I reproduced the abiword failure, it's in enchant: > > | /bin/sh ../../arm-angstrom-linux-gnueabi-libtool --tag=CC > - --mode=link ccache arm-angstrom-linux-gnueabi-gcc -march=armv7-a > - -mtune=cortex-a8 -mfpu=neon -mfloat-abi=softfp > - > -isystem/OE/angstrom-dev/sysroots/armv7a-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/usr/include > - -fexpensive-optimizations -frename-registers -fomit-frame-pointer -O2 > - -ggdb3 -module -avoid-version -no-undefined > - -L/OE/angstrom-dev/sysroots/armv7a-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/usr/lib > - > -Wl,-rpath-link,/OE/angstrom-dev/sysroots/armv7a-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/usr/lib > - -Wl,-O1 -Wl,--hash-style=gnu -o libenchant_aspell.la -rpath > /usr/lib/enchant aspell_provider.lo -Wl,--export-dynamic -pthread > - -lgmodule-2.0 -lrt -lglib-2.0 > - -L/OE/angstrom-dev/sysroots/armv7a-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/usr/lib > - -laspell ../../src/libenchant.la > | /bin/grep: > /OE/angstrom-dev/cross/armv7a/arm-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/lib/libstdc++.la: > No such file or directory > | /bin/sed: can't read > /OE/angstrom-dev/cross/armv7a/arm-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/lib/libstdc++.la: > No such file or directory > | arm-angstrom-linux-gnueabi-libtool: link: > `/OE/angstrom-dev/cross/armv7a/arm-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/lib/libstdc++.la' > is not a valid libtool archive > > The file referenced > (/OE/angstrom-dev/cross/armv7a/arm-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/lib/libstdc++.la) > doesn't exist since it is located in > /OE/angstrom-dev/sysroots/armv7a-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/usr/lib/libstdc++.la > instead. > > Any clues in which direction I should look to debug this?
Sorry I've not been able to spend the time I'd like on this stuff, work and travel have got in the way and are probably going to tie me up for a while yet if I'm realistic. Anyone at ELC should say hello btw! :) Jet lag prevents me thinking too clearly at the moment but whats happening above is that the sysroot is starting to look more like the real target filesystem and libstdc++ is moving to what I would say is the correct place for it. This is good but it seems something, probably a .la file has the incorrect path? Is this a build from scratch or an old build? I suspect it would work with a build from scratch but if this was one, there is some more subtle problem :/. Alternatively, the lamangler may be causing this by leaving incorrect paths in the .la files as I saw that issue isn't addressed yet. Cheers, Richard _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
