Am 22.04.2010 um 14:46 schrieb Antonio Ospite: > On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 12:55:43 +0100 > Phil Blundell <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Thu, 2010-04-22 at 13:43 +0200, Antonio Ospite wrote: >>> 2. If I install any package which depends on udev then udev is brought >>> in and the static layout is gone at the next boot. >> >> I think your best option is probably to make udev be a DISTRO_FEATURE >> and not set it for your own distribution. >> >> If you genuinely want udev to be selected (for your particular DISTRO) >> on a per-MACHINE basis then you'll have to invent some way to nobble its >> startup script so that it just doesn't do anything on machines where it >> isn't wanted. >> > > A per-MACHINE way would be better IMHO, I am thinking about > adding a check on something like /dev/.staticdev (suggested in [1]) to > both udev init script and to the 'device' script from initscripts, and > make the image class add the /dev/.staticdev file when > IMAGE_DEV_MANAGER == "" (or maybe == "static" or "none"?) > > Does this sound reasonable?
Please also handle the case where we neither want an IMAGE_DEV_MANAGER nor static device population, since we use devtmpfs. :M: _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
