On Tue, 2010-04-27 at 12:14 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi, > > Currently conflicting headers are both in glibc-dev and > linux-libc-headers-dev, which isn't a good thing. According to the > interwebs we should use the linux-libc-headers version. > > Anyone opposed to removing the scsi headers from glibc? It would > basically involve reverting > http://cgit.openembedded.org/cgit.cgi/openembedded/commit/?id=b8bb2a62b3916470c752bd79d31322b4358fc676 > and > http://cgit.openembedded.org/cgit.cgi/openembedded/commit/?id=83f41716ab6a2a9d83d4ff044dcef00595ecfeb2
So, I did both of those after checking the interwebs and poking some kernel folks (see comments in http://bugs.openembedded.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4262 ). The question is, did the kernel folks change their mind again and we need to either drop older linux-libc-headers (which I'll just assume is a no-go) or go back to removing them in new enough linux-libc-headers. -- Tom Rini <[email protected]> Mentor Graphics Corporation _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
