В сообщении от Воскресенье 02 мая 2010 14:21:38 автор Eric Benard написал: > - update autotool patch for this version > - tested on x86 > > Signed-off-by: Eric Benard <[email protected]> > --- > v2 : > fix the autotools patch to have the correct version number > remove whitspaces
Please, the next time you submit updated version of any patch go to patchwork.openembedded.org and update the status of old one to "Superseded". I've done that for this particular patch as I've looked at it anyway, but at quick glance there are other leftovers there, so it'd be nice if you've cleaned that up. > recipes/zlib/files/0001-autotools.patch | 57 > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ recipes/zlib/zlib-native_1.2.5.bb | > 9 +++++ > recipes/zlib/zlib-sdk_1.2.5.bb | 4 ++ > recipes/zlib/zlib_1.2.5.bb | 22 ++++++++++++ > 4 files changed, 92 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 recipes/zlib/files/0001-autotools.patch > create mode 100644 recipes/zlib/zlib-native_1.2.5.bb > create mode 100644 recipes/zlib/zlib-sdk_1.2.5.bb > create mode 100644 recipes/zlib/zlib_1.2.5.bb I think it'd be nice to do BBCLASSEXTEND conversion here (there was an attempt: http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel/2010-March/018132.html ) and add new version with a move to common .inc file. > --- /dev/null > +++ b/recipes/zlib/zlib_1.2.5.bb > @@ -0,0 +1,22 @@ > +DESCRIPTION = "Zlib Compression Library" > +SECTION = "libs" > +PRIORITY = "required" > +HOMEPAGE = "http://www.gzip.org/zlib/"; > +LICENSE = "zlib" > +PR ="r1" PR should be "r0". > +inherit autotools > + > +do_stage() { > + autotools_stage_all > +} Maybe change this to inherit autotools_stage ? -- http://roman.khimov.ru mailto: [email protected] gpg --keyserver hkp://subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 0xE5E055C3
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
