On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 10:31 AM, Martin Jansa <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 3:35 PM, Frans Meulenbroeks > <[email protected]> wrote: >> I feel the above commit is not sound. >> If I pull the head eglibc does not build for me because apparently >> eglibc-initial does not stage limits.h any more. >> If I revert to the commit before this one, eglibc and eglibc-initial >> build, so this seems to break things. >> >> It might be that this went unnoticed, because there is no PR bump in >> this commit (which I would have expected, but technically if the new >> and old staging result is identical is not necessary). > > Hi, > > What version are you trying to build? > Today I've built version 2.11 before this patch as well as after this patch. > Both during rebuild from scratch and both after RP's WIP branch merge. > > So this patch seems OK to me. I was expecting PR bump too, but it's not > a big issue today, because many people rebuild from scratch, > > Regards, >
Yeah, I did not bump the PR thinking that a rebuild is enforced with branch merge but RP mentioned that the new changes are compatible with the old staging so I should have bumped PR we can still do it if needed. _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
