2010/5/9 Tom Rini <[email protected]>: > On Sat, 2010-05-08 at 08:11 -0700, Tom Rini wrote: >> On Sat, 2010-05-08 at 09:06 +0200, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: >> > 2010/5/7 Tom Rini <[email protected]>: >> > > Hey all, >> > > >> > > With DISTRO=minimal and MACHINE=calamari, I see the following failure in >> > > gnutls (using fe4ff6940b06c73d5b88224b99750bf65accf13d in oe.dev): >> > > http://pastebin.com/cjAStcLb and I confirmed this prior to the RP merge, >> > > so this is unrelated. >> > >> > Which eglibc is that? >> > The issues I had seemed due to some catch22 situation that I cured; I >> > started a clean build yesterday before I left work & can tell the >> > results on monday. >> > My distro was angstrom, machine calamari, this uses eglibc 2.10. Is >> > minimal also using 2.10 or is it at 2.11 >> > >> > I can also try to kick off a minimal build on monday >> >> minimal is eglibc 2.10. I'll try an Angstrom build. > > With Angstrom, gcc-cross-initial fails building libgcc, config.log has: > cc1: error: not configured for ABI: 'spe' > configure:2591: $? = 1 > configure: failed program was: > ... standard empty program ... > configure:2605: error: cannot compute suffix of object files: cannot > compile > > Ubuntu 9.10 x86_64 host >
I made a mistake when doing the clean build, and kicked it off again. I don't think I saw your error. In my local.conf I have: MACHINE = "calamari" DISTRO = "angstrom-2008.1" ANGSTROMLIBC = "eglibc" # e500v2 supports the SPE instruction set. TARGET_OS = "linux-gnuspe" Perhaps the TARGET_OS line influences how libgcc is build. Frans _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
