-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 09-06-10 15:53, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote:
> 2010/6/9 Holger Freyther <[email protected]>:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> we didn't really have much to talk....
>>
>>
>>
>> == Renaming the org.openmebdded.dev branch ==
>>
>> We were carrying the org.openembedd.dev branch name from the monotone
>> era into the git era and the TSC was asked to consider renaming it to
>> 'master' which is the git default for the main development tree. Now the
>> actual change on the server will be minor what is of a bigger concern
>> are the existing users and documentation.
> 
> Technically speaking I think we should have run an RFC for this before
> it was brought to the table of the TSC.
> 
> Personally the org.openembedded.dev branch name does not bother me
> although I know master is the 'standard' git name.
> Afaik renaming does not really solve a problem.

Ah well, seeing that the TSC completely failed to implement anything of
the things they decided on last month I think we can stop worrying about
this for the next few months. Does the TSC use FIFO or LIFO for their
targets?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFMEoB7MkyGM64RGpERAhaEAJ4ix66HITFX983gh3axyaXRJkUEYQCgihFu
aeJb69Aqv3epd/0KxTMWgrQ=
=BqdY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


_______________________________________________
Openembedded-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel

Reply via email to