2010/6/20 Frans Meulenbroeks <[email protected]>: > 2010/6/20 Koen Kooi <[email protected]>: >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> On 20-06-10 11:58, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I'm about to complete bringing a new architecture (nios2 with mmu) and >>> machine (cyclone III FPGA starter kit, and maybe also the Nios2 >>> Embeddeded Evaluation Kit (aka neek)) to oe. >>> Is there a policy on on the process how to do this. >> >> Have a look at the nios2 patches Leon sent last december, they were >> reviewed on this list, but not committed. > > Koen, thanks for reminding me the look at the review comments. > > I'm well aware of the work of Leon and Walter (and they are well aware > of my work). > Note that what Leon posted was for a non-mmu nios2 core, whereas the > changes I have is for an mmu core. > > Triggered by Koens reminder I revisited the review comments. Actually > none but one are applicable for me. > The one that is applicable is the one about pinning versions in > machine descriptions. > I have also done that, as there are simply no other versions of > binutils and gcc that can be used by this hardware. > Also I don't feel empowered to make changes in distribution specific files. > > The only alternative way that I can think of is doing something like: > DEFAULT_PREFERENCE_nios2 = "1" in the recipes I need. > No idea if that overrules the distro settings or not, but I can give > it a try later today.
Well, tried it and apparently a distro pin has priority over a DEFAULT_PREFERENCE_nios2 in the recipe. Guess I'll have to do the pinning the the machine description as described above. Frans. _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
