I was hoping someone would ask :) I'm working on a product that will need updates in the field, which means potentially updating u-boot or the kernel. Right now I'm trying to keep all of my files in one hierarchy for various reasons, so I would rather not use /boot.
Thanks! -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Tom Rini Sent: Friday, July 02, 2010 3:14 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [oe] [PATCH] allow KERNEL_IMAGEDEST to be redefined Jim Sheldon wrote: > Signed-off-by: Jim Sheldon <[email protected]> > --- > classes/kernel.bbclass | 2 +- > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/classes/kernel.bbclass b/classes/kernel.bbclass > index b0c6534..d9c9eed 100644 > --- a/classes/kernel.bbclass > +++ b/classes/kernel.bbclass > @@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ KERNEL_LD = "${LD}${KERNEL_LDSUFFIX} ${HOST_LD_KERNEL_ARCH}" > > # Where built kernel lies in the kernel tree > KERNEL_OUTPUT ?= "arch/${ARCH}/boot/${KERNEL_IMAGETYPE}" > -KERNEL_IMAGEDEST = "boot" > +KERNEL_IMAGEDEST ?= "boot" > > # > # configuration OK, so there's nothing wrong with how this or the u-boot one are done, but why? Thanks! -- Tom Rini Mentor Graphics Corporation _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
