On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 9:01 AM, Detlef Vollmann <d...@vollmann.ch> wrote:
> On 07/18/10 17:13, Chris Larson wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 3:06 AM, Detlef Vollmann <d...@vollmann.ch> wrote:
>>
>> On 07/16/10 16:25, Richard Purdie wrote:
>>>
>>> For the specific case of paths, I have wondered if there would be a way
>>>> to leverage help from bitbake in creating a sane set of search paths but
>>>> I'm still thinking about that. This extension is good enough in its own
>>>> right in my opinion to be worthwhile.
>>>>
>>>> This might be true, but solving the general path problem would be
>>> much more useful.
>>> If you want to add a new version of e.g. gcc in your ovlerlay,
>>> you have to pull over the whole gcc directory with all its .inc classes.
>>> This can't be solved by .bbapend, or am I missing something?
>>>
>>
>>
>> You can handle that today by adding to FILESPATHBASE. All file:// files
>> from SRC_URI are located using FILESPATH, which is constructed from
>> FILESPATHBASE, FILESPATHPKG, and OVERRIDES.
>>
> AFAIK this doen't work for include/require :-(
Don't copy the recipe at all, use .bbappend instead, and you won't need to
have the .inc in a different collection from the recipe itself.
Alternatively, you can adjust BBPATH to also include the other collection
based paths + os.path.dirname('${FILE_DIRNAME}') or so.
--
Christopher Larson
clarson at kergoth dot com
Founder - BitBake, OpenEmbedded, OpenZaurus
Maintainer - Tslib
Senior Software Engineer, Mentor Graphics
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
