On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 1:24 PM, Richard Purdie <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, 2010-07-23 at 11:23 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote: >> On Fri, 2010-07-23 at 11:35 +0200, Esben Haabendal wrote: >> > config.sub will generally not accept something like armv7a-* >> >> That's probably true, but it ought to accept armv7a-*-* (and has done >> for about fifteen years, so I expect almost all packages should now have >> picked up that change). I think OE always uses the triple so there >> oughtn't to be any problem in practice. > > With tune-atom.inc active you'd have core2-*-* which I suspect > config.sub will not accept. The point is the names we choose for sets of > optimisation flags are not necessarily going to map well to config.sub > and we shouldn't be crossing what are currently two independent > namespaces...
Definitely not. The question is why these two namespaces has to be independent. But nevermind, I am just rambling here. /Esben _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
