On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 4:55 AM, Phil Blundell <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, 2010-07-21 at 15:44 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: >> +# Add thumb-interwork to feature list if selected machine supports it. >> +DISTRO_FEATURES += ' $...@["", >> "thumb-interwork"][bb.data.getVar('THUMB_INTERWORK', d, 1) == "yes"]}' > > Would it not be better to put this in some generic place (maybe even > bitbake.conf) rather than adding it to every DISTRO individually? > >> --- a/conf/distro/include/slugos.inc >> +++ b/conf/distro/include/slugos.inc >> @@ -23,9 +23,18 @@ DISTRO_VERSION ?= >> "${SLUGOS_VERSION}${DISTRO_REVISION}-${DISTRO_TYPE}" >> # DISTRO_FEED ?= "${SLUGOS_VERSION}-${DISTRO_TYPE}" >> DISTRO_FEED ?= "unstable" >> >> +THUMB_INTERWORK = "yes" >> +# "yes" "no" >> +# Whether to compile with code to allow interworking between the two >> +# instruction sets. This allows thumb code to be executed on a primarily >> +# arm system and vice versa. It is strongly recommended that DISTROs not >> +# turn this off - the actual cost is very small. >> # We want images supporting the following features (for task-base) >> DISTRO_FEATURES = "nfs smbfs wifi ppp alsa bluetooth ext2 vfat irda pcmcia >> usbgadget usbhost pci" > > Is this a policy change for slugos? If so, are the SlugOS people happy > with it? >
argggh I did not want to push it just yet. I will revert it. git push pushes staged commits on all branches I will have to modify my scripts to only push specific branch. > p. > > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel > _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
