Am 26.07.2010 um 14:22 schrieb Koen Kooi: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 26-07-10 14:08, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: >> 2010/7/26 Koen Kooi <[email protected]> >> >> On 26-07-10 11:42, Florian Boor wrote: >>>>> Hi all, >>>>> >>>>> I tried to build a "minimal" distribution image lately and ran into some >> trouble >>>>> because the old-style native packages seem to be preferred over the new >> ones >>>>> using BBCLASSEXTEND. >>>>> In this case we have glib-2.0-native 2.24.1 provided by the new mechanism >> and >>>>> 2.22.1 gets build which is the latest old-style native bb. >> >> That's minimals broken by design behaviour, it refuses to pin any >> version. So either pin the version or switch to a sane distro like >> angstrom or shr. >> >> >> >>> Hm. I would expect that if there is a glib-2.0 recipe 2.24.1 with >>> BBCLASSEXTEND = "native" and no pinning and no DEFAULT_PREFERENCE being in >>> effect, that 2.24.1 gets build and not 2.22.1 which has a real native >>> recipe. To me recipes with -native and implict ones with BBCLASSEXTEND = >>> "native" are equivalent prioritywise, so I'd say this is a bug in the class >>> code. > > And that bug has been known for months and reported multiple times by > people attempting to use minimal. And for so far the bug has been fixed > in bitbake 1.10, but minimal still refuses to pin versions, so the > advice to switch distro still stands.
Of course the preferred way - rather than switching distros - is to fix this obvious bug in the OE metadata. Cheers, :M: _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
