Am Donnerstag 29 Juli 2010, 10:50:53 schrieb Frans Meulenbroeks: > Dear all, > > Given the discussions on quality that sometimes pop up (and also triggered > by Robert's message), I decided to kick off a bitbake -k world. > Below are some initial findings. I would like to use this as a starter to > kickoff the discusson on quality and what to do with broken stuff. > And also I hope that people who feel attached to a recipe mentioned below > will take action. > > My setting: > local.conf: > IMAGE_LINGUAS = "" > ENABLE_BINARY_LOCALE_GENERATION = "0" > > MACHINE = "beagleboard" > DISTRO = "angstrom-2008.1" > > EXTRA_IMAGECMD_jffs2 = "--pad --eraseblock=0x20000" > MKUBIFS_ARGS = "-m 2048 -e 129024 -c 1024" > > IMAGE_FSTYPES = "tar squashfs ubifs jffs2" > IMAGE_KEEPROOTFS = "1" > OE_ALLOW_INSECURE_DOWNLOADS = "yes" > > I opted for angstromg and beagleboard as I feel this is the most often > build configuration, so it should have the least issues. > host is ubuntu 10.04 on 64 bit. tree is oe dev git head (as of jul 29) > > All results are not in yet (there are 71047 taksks, I am at 159 :-) > However the parsing already gave some interesting output. > I've ordered them somehwat: > > Nothing PROVIDES errors > =================== > ... Some of these 'Nothing PROVIDES' errors are because you are using angstrom as distro and some recipes are blacklisted there (e.g. fso-apm), because of that a lot of the shr specific recipes aren't buildable.
I think one should do such a test with minimal distro because nothing is blacklisted there. Other recipes like etk or epsilon were moved to obsolete, but recipes depending on them weren't. So i think recipes depending on etk and epsilon can be moved to obsolete too. Regards Thomas _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
