On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 10:44 AM, Koen Kooi <[email protected]> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 27-07-10 08:48, Khem Raj wrote: >> Hi >> >> Following series of patches are for making multi-machine toolchains co-exist >> with >> new cross staging for toolchain. >> >> It changes the toolchain triplet from ${TARGET_ARCH}-${VENDOR}-${OS} to >> ${TARGET_ARCH}-${CPU_SUB_TARGET}_${VENDOR}-OS >> >> which means that a toolchain for armv7 is called arm-v7a_oe-linux-gnueabi-* >> and for armv5te its called arm-v5te_oe-linux-gnueabi-* >> >> They can coexist in same native sysroot. The symlinks would mean that >> gcc will not accidently mix the assemblers or linkers. >> >> MULTIMACH-* is not needed anymore as the TARGET_SYS is distinct enough >> to serve same purpose. >> >> I have booted a minimal-image on qemuarm qemuppc and qemumips successfully. >> The build for >> beagleboard native-sdk-image completed too. > > So what's the status on this? The problem is still present in .dev, this > patchset introduces other problems and Phil & Richard want to take a > different approach. > Were do we go from here? I'd love to help out if I knew which approach > is the right one. I'm not fond of abusing TARGET_VENDOR, but if the > consensus is that's the way forward, so be it.
Yes I am not pursuing it as it does not seem to be a popular approach. We could walk the remaining issues but we have to agree on it and then fix the fallouts. > > regards, > > Koen > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) > > iD8DBQFMUb31MkyGM64RGpERAtchAKCiNdy7Nbts/5fxA/wrUbrwZgpZRQCfcCcf > kcCkAByszubSkNi1H/ExBnU= > =UFfn > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel > _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
