On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 6:05 PM, Graham Gower <[email protected]> wrote: > On 11 August 2010 09:56, Philip Balister <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 08/10/2010 04:47 PM, Graham Gower wrote: >>> >>> find conf -type f -exec sed -i -e 's/^PREFERRED_VERSION_\([^ \t]*\)\([ >>> \t]*\)=/PREFERRED_VERSION_\1\2?=/' {} \; >> >> Shouldn't DISTRO's decide on a per DISTRO decision whether or not their >> preferred versions are weak? >> >> I;m not entirely opposed to make the assignment weak for Angstrom, but I am >> very opposed to making all DISTRO's use the same policy. > > Surely having disunity by giving different distros different policies > would be worse?
whats issue with current versioning ? you always have _local override if you want to disregard what DISTRO sets it to. IMO it should be left upto DISTRO to hard assign or weak assign them. I dont think its a good idea to make all weak -Khem > >> >> It is a real nuisance trying to debug someone's Angstrom build, only to fins >> out they have loads of local overrides. > > Point taken. local.conf really should be a mandatory piece of > information when reporting an issue. > >> >> Philip >> > > -Graham > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel > _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
