On Sun, 15 Aug 2010, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote:
I've made a list of patch files in recipes (prefixed with file://) and
compared it with the list of patch files as appear on disk.
Below is the list of 645 files that do not show up in any recipe and
as such can be considered as orphaned.
Proposal is to remove these files after double checking that they are
indeed not used.
Do people agree with this? If so can I have an ack?
And do we want to have a commit for every file (makes it easy to
revert an error) or a big commit with all removals?
(removals per dir are also possible but that process is more difficult
to automate and hence not my preferred solution.
Your opinion is appreciated.
Frans
Hello Frans,
how did you create that list? As I see it, there must be an error in the
analysis somewhere:
htmldoc paths_1.8.27.patch
vi...@asterix:/home/nobkp/oe.dev/recipes/htmldoc$ fgrep -C 1 paths_1.8.27.patch
*
htmldoc_1.8.27.bb-SRC_URI = "http://..../htmldoc-${PV}-source.tar.bz2 \
htmldoc_1.8.27.bb:file://paths_1.8.27.patch"
htmldoc_1.8.27.bb-
--
htmldoc-gui_1.8.27.bb-SRC_URI = "http://..../${PV}/htmldoc-${PV}-source.tar.bz2
\
htmldoc-gui_1.8.27.bb:file://paths_1.8.27.patch"
htmldoc-gui_1.8.27.bb-
--
htmldoc-native_1.8.27.bb-SRC_URI = "http://.../htmldoc-${PV}-source.tar.bz2 \
htmldoc-native_1.8.27.bb:file://paths_1.8.27.patch"
htmldoc-native_1.8.27.bb-
vi...@asterix:/home/nobkp/oe.dev/recipes/htmldoc$ find . -name
paths_1.8.27.patch
./files/paths_1.8.27.patch
vi...@asterix:/home/nobkp/oe.dev/recipes/htmldoc$
Best regards,
Vitus
--
Vitus Jensen, Hannover, Germany, Universe (current)
pgp public key available from keyservers
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
