В сообщении от Суббота 21 августа 2010 21:38:48 автор Khem Raj написал: > On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 9:03 AM, Roman I Khimov <[email protected]> wrote: > > It wasn't possible to install prepackaged clamav-data with the way it's > > been packaged. And there are situations where you want to have at least > > prepackaged AV databases before you could do any sort of update. Also, > > logically freshclam doesn't substitute clamav-data, but rather > > complements it. > > > > Signed-off-by: Roman I Khimov <[email protected]> > > Will there be any conflicts with prepackaged clamav-data > otherwise you have the ack.
Well, -data is data. -freshclam is freshclam. Freshclam updates the data, but the data files are defined as CONFFILES already, so there is no conflict at this level. But thinking another 5 minutes about it there is an issue with this patch in that it actually makes clamav-data installation (and that is huge, 25M) _mandatory_, whether you want that or not depends on situation. We want that (hence the patch), someone might not. Technically, there are three possible installation combinations, each has its valid use: * clamav-data * clamav-freshclam * clamav-data & clamav-freshclam Before the patch only second one was possible (probably with the recent BAD_RECOMMENDATIONS fixes to opkg and OE also the first one). After the patch only first and third will be possible. Do we really care about second case? And if yes, how to allow all of three to coexist? -- http://roman.khimov.ru mailto: [email protected] gpg --keyserver hkp://subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 0xE5E055C3
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
