On Aug 20, 2010, at 5:36 AM, Eric Bénard wrote: > Hi Sean, > > Le 19/08/2010 21:21, Sean Cross a écrit : >> On Aug 19, 2010, at 1:32 AM, Koen Kooi wrote: >>> Can't this me merged into the .26.28 kernel recipe? >>> >> I can do that, but the resulting patch is 28 megabytes. I think >> that's a bit big. >> >> It's Freescale's kernel patch, which supports all of their >> processors, not just the i.MX233. My guess is that nobody's tried to >> get these patches into the kernel upstream. >> >> The resulting patch I get is mostly an additive patch, as I count >> 800,000 added lines in the patch, and 1200 removed lines. >> > maybe using Freecale git server with the right revision will allow you > to only have one smaller patch which adds support of your board : > http://opensource.freescale.com/git?p=imx/linux-2.6-imx.git;a=summary
I'll work on doing that. But I don't see any other Linux kernel recipes that use this repo. What's the advantage of using this GIT server and including a patch against it, rather than pulling the chumby tgz file and not having any patches? Sean _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
