I think this is very bad that we apparenlty have a recipe from 2006 that has a problem with a lib that is not there: The DEPENDS is also from 2006. Was it possible to have broken depends in the past, or was xmu a good depends in the past? If not, is it worthwhile to keep recipes from 2006 that are apparently not maintained and have been kept around for so long ?
Anyway wrt the patch: Acked-by: Frans Meulenbroeks <[email protected]> 2010/8/28 Khem Raj <[email protected]>: > Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <[email protected]> > --- > recipes/xqt2/xqt2_20060509.bb | 2 +- > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/recipes/xqt2/xqt2_20060509.bb b/recipes/xqt2/xqt2_20060509.bb > index 7634d27..4492bc7 100644 > --- a/recipes/xqt2/xqt2_20060509.bb > +++ b/recipes/xqt2/xqt2_20060509.bb > @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ > DESCRIPTION = "Xqt2 is an X-Server than runs within the Opie environment" > HOMEPAGE = "http://xqt.sourceforge.jp"; > -DEPENDS = "freetype libxi xmu flex-native virtual/libqte2 libqpe-opie" > +DEPENDS = "freetype libxi libxmu flex-native virtual/libqte2 libqpe-opie" > LICENSE = "GPL" > SECTION = "opie/applications" > APPTYPE = "binary" > -- > 1.7.1 > > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel > _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
