On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 12:25 AM, Frans Meulenbroeks <[email protected]> wrote: > I seem to recall from previous discussion that it will still build. > Haven't tested that part.
Well as I said if this recipe is broken the patch does not break it any more than it already is. > Still: > Acked-by: Frans Meulenbroeks <[email protected]> > > > 2010/8/28 Khem Raj <[email protected]>: >> Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <[email protected]> >> --- >> recipes/sugar/sugar-fructose.bb | 2 +- >> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/recipes/sugar/sugar-fructose.bb >> b/recipes/sugar/sugar-fructose.bb >> index ad0db39..697ac21 100644 >> --- a/recipes/sugar/sugar-fructose.bb >> +++ b/recipes/sugar/sugar-fructose.bb >> @@ -1,3 +1,3 @@ >> DESCRIPTION = "Sugar fructose activities" >> >> -DEPENDS = "etoys sugar-web-activity" >> +DEPENDS = "etoys" >> -- >> 1.7.1 >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Openembedded-devel mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel >> > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel > _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
