-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 30-08-10 18:16, Andreas Mueller wrote:
> 1. One of the reasons which lead me to the huge patches was my wish to remove > versions from recipe names and prevent from inconsistency. E.g If I would > only post clutter_1.2.12.bb it > would not be build in case I want clutter-box2d. What is the reason behind > this naming-style? Is it still required with stable releases of clutter? It is used to seperate the clutter api/abi change. 0.8 is parallel installable with 1.0 (0.9 is 1.0rc), so the naming is there to support both kinds of clutter. What I wanted to do, but didn't find time for: 1) name the clutter 0.8 series clutter-*-0.8 2) name the post 0.8 series clutter-* That should be safe to do since clutter 1.2 is supposed to be compatible with 1.0. regards, Koen -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) iD8DBQFMfL7wMkyGM64RGpERAi2fAJwNrwNKqfQfNaLGIAMbRP24BY9QfQCeMJ5F LbSlxfGa14D6A8tSD5ni8NQ= =M7BW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
