On Sun, 2010-08-29 at 13:39 +0200, Steffen Sledz wrote: > Am 28.08.2010 01:34, schrieb Khem Raj: > >>> +INITSCRIPT_PARAMS = "start 20 2 3 4 5 . stop 90 0 1 6 ." > >> > >> I just wanted to ask if there are any objections (e.g. a policy on > >> using start/stop order 'levels') in using 'stop 90' here. > >> > > > > I guess its distro maintainers call isnt it ? > > I'm not sure if it is. That's why i asked for policies about this. ;-)
Yes, the DISTRO maintainers would have the final say about start/stop levels (and, indeed, whether to use sysvinit at all). But it seems sensible for the package to provide reasonable defaults that would be acceptable to some/most distros. p. _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
