> >
> > ##################################################################
> > # Include the rest of the config files.
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > J.
>
> Is there really a case for a ${TARGET_ARCH}_${SOC_FAMILY} override. If these
> devices have different architectures are they really part of the same family?
>
> As for adding this to bitbake.conf I guess I wouldn't object, but I don't
> know that this is something everyone would want. Instead you could put this
> in your distro's conf file (like angstrom does) or in your local.conf file.
I disagree as example I've to apply patch to gcc, binutils or directfb and
other componets so it's absolutelt not distro specific but SoC and hardware
specific
so if we make it distros specific we will have to add it to all of them to
support this familly of SoC
Best Regards,
J.
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
