2010/9/4 Chris Larson <[email protected]>: > On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 10:28 AM, C Michael Sundius > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> I have been using a addition that I made to the stamp policy a while ago. >> I sent it to the OE list and the bitbake list but I don't think that it was >> ever adopted, >> eventhough I *think* that I got one or two positive replies to it: >> >> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.handhelds.openembedded/29858/ >> >> I would love to see this patch added to bitbake so I don't have to keep it >> around >> in my repository. >> >> do any of you have any ferther comments? >> > > Hmm, should it always be used, the way the patch does currently, or should > it be more the way the whitelist is done, where it only affects for > fulldeptree? I'm not opposed to this going into bitbake, personally. > I can't judge on the remarks from Chris on the implementation. The patch from Michael does look sound to me, but I have never looked at the whitelist code. The only thing missing in Michaels patch is some documentation on these nwe vars.
Frans _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
