> add global OVERRIDES ${TARGET_SOC_FAMILY} and
> ${TARGET_ARCH}_${TARGET_SOC_FAMILY}
>
For my part I would ask why you are renaming SOC_FAMILY to TARGET_SOC_FAMILY?
Why not leave the name the way it is since others may be using it in overlays,
etc?
Also, you might want to make sure your patch would include Fran's fix to
base.bbclass that he mentioned at
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel/2010-September/023680.html
For what my input is worth I would NAK this patch because:
1. I don't see a reason to add this to the generic set of overrides.
2. I don't understand why the name of the variable SOC_FAMILY needs to be
changed. I know this will break existing overlays and I don't see any reason
why the change is made.
3. I disagree with the ${TARGET_ARCH}_${TARGET_SOC_FAMILY} override. If you
have two patch series for different architectures then you should have two
SOC_FAMILY settings or use the MACHINE setting for the override. I think this
override is confusing and redundant.
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
