2010/9/13 Roman I Khimov <[email protected]>: > В сообщении от Понедельник 13 сентября 2010 17:02:59 автор Frans Meulenbroeks > написал: >> 2010/9/13 Roman I Khimov <[email protected]>: >> > В сообщении от Воскресенье 05 сентября 2010 04:00:14 автор Henry von >> > Tresckow >> > >> > написал: >> >> Signed-off-by: Henry von Tresckow <[email protected]> >> >> --- >> >> recipes/dnsmasq/dnsmasq-dbus_2.55.bb | 13 +++++++++++++ >> >> recipes/dnsmasq/dnsmasq_2.55.bb | 4 ++++ >> >> 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) >> >> create mode 100644 recipes/dnsmasq/dnsmasq-dbus_2.55.bb >> >> create mode 100644 recipes/dnsmasq/dnsmasq_2.55.bb >> > >> > Acked-by: Roman I Khimov <[email protected]> >> >> No problem with this version, but is it useful to keep versions like 2.52. >> Please avoid version clutter! > > At least it doesn't hurt in this case IMO. Although 2.55 works fine here since > July (with technically exactly the same patch, somehow I've missed it when was > looking for things to push in OE) it has many various changes compared to > 2.52, maybe too many for someone.
Well my main concern is that we have now 6 versions of this recipe, and I think hardly anyone has an idea on the differences between these. And are the older versions still maintained by someone? Frans. _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
