From: Rasmus Villemoes <[email protected]> It can be useful to include snagboot in the SDK, so allow building that variant. While I don't see a use case for it during build, there's no reason not to also allow building the -native variant while at it.
Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <[email protected]> --- meta-python/recipes-devtools/python/python3-snagboot_2.5.bb | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/meta-python/recipes-devtools/python/python3-snagboot_2.5.bb b/meta-python/recipes-devtools/python/python3-snagboot_2.5.bb index fe496ffc2f..a280103d63 100644 --- a/meta-python/recipes-devtools/python/python3-snagboot_2.5.bb +++ b/meta-python/recipes-devtools/python/python3-snagboot_2.5.bb @@ -19,3 +19,5 @@ RDEPENDS:${PN} += " \ do_install:append() { install -D -m 0644 ${S}/src/snagrecover/50-snagboot.rules ${D}${sysconfdir}/udev/rules.d/50-snagboot.rules } + +BBCLASSEXTEND = "native nativesdk" -- 2.53.0
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#125165): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-devel/message/125165 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/118277525/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-devel/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
