From: Deepak Rathore <[email protected]>

Some SDK dependency chains require python3-future to be available
as SDK artifacts. The current metadata only partially provides this,
which can lead to dependency resolution failures when this recipe is pulled
into SDK-oriented builds.

This change does not alter target package behavior; it only enables required
nativesdk variant for build and SDK integration paths.

Signed-off-by: Deepak Rathore <[email protected]>
---
 meta-python/recipes-devtools/python/python3-future_1.0.0.bb | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/meta-python/recipes-devtools/python/python3-future_1.0.0.bb 
b/meta-python/recipes-devtools/python/python3-future_1.0.0.bb
index eb66a7d33c..d11b560644 100644
--- a/meta-python/recipes-devtools/python/python3-future_1.0.0.bb
+++ b/meta-python/recipes-devtools/python/python3-future_1.0.0.bb
@@ -9,4 +9,4 @@ PYPI_PACKAGE_HASH = 
"99abde815842bc6e97d5a7806ad51236630da14ca2f3b1fce94c0bb94d3
 
 inherit pypi setuptools3
 
-BBCLASSEXTEND = "native"
+BBCLASSEXTEND = "native nativesdk"
-- 
2.35.6

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#125229): 
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-devel/message/125229
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/118327830/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-devel/unsub 
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to