Hi, 2010/9/27 Eric Bénard <[email protected]>: > Hi, > > Le 26/09/2010 22:42, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu a écrit : >> >> 2010/9/25 Khem Raj<[email protected]>: >>> >>> On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 2:56 PM, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu<[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> --- a/conf/machine/include/tune-sh4.inc >>>> +++ b/conf/machine/include/tune-sh4.inc >>>> @@ -1,3 +1,5 @@ >>>> +# If you want to optimize to sh4a, you need to change >>>> +# from -m4 to m4a. >>>> TARGET_CC_ARCH = "-ml -m4" >>>> FEED_ARCH = "sh4" >>>> BASE_PACKAGE_ARCH = "sh4" >>> >>> you could add another tune file for sh4a called >>> tune-sh4a.inc and include that for appropriate >>> machines. rest of patch looks good to me. >> >> I want to make optimization of m4 a default. >> The reason is because there is not compatibility in m4 and m4a. >> It is a memo for the person whom it wants to optimize in m4a that I >> wrote in tune-sh4.inc. >> >> I thought that I have had better take off a memo if confusion happened >> by this memo. >> How do you think? >> > As Khem said, it's better to have tune-sh4a.inc & tune-sh4.inc in the > include directory which let the user the possibility to include the one he > wants in his machine configuration file (without the need to modifiy the > include file).
Oh, sorry. I misread. I will send new patch. Best regards, Nobuhiro -- Nobuhiro Iwamatsu _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
