On 9/27/2010 1:19 AM, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: > 2010/9/26 Martin Jansa <[email protected]>: > >> There was about ~1000 recipes failing to fetch few months ago, I don't >> think this number is that much lower as I haven't seen any changes in >> most of them. >> >> See my download status: >> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel/2010-April/019206.html >> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel/2010-April/019234.html > > April is 5 months ago. Question is if it makes sense to keep recipes > that are broken for > 5 months and no one who saw a need to fix them > or complained about them. > Personally I'm inclined to say it is a waste to spend any time on > these. I would suggest moving them to e.g. nonworking but I guess the > people who mix up quality and quantity will disagree on this.
Mix up quality and quantity? That's a gross mischaracterization on your part, and I quite resent it. There are valid reasons for some of those. If it is now necessary to make Mr. Jansa like the comments on the ixp4xx firmware recipe in order to keep the recipe in OE, I will update those. But I cannot make it so that Intel will not require click-throughs in order to download the firmware files. -Mike (mwester) _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
