2010/10/7 Tom Rini <[email protected]>: > Hey all, > > I'm looking to update libtiff to cover some security issues in the version > we ship, and I noticed something funny about how we do it today. Currently > tiff_3.9.2.bb sets PV to 3.9.2+4.0.0beta5 and grabs and builds 4.0.0beta5. > While it's possible that in the past 3.9.2 was intended to be the last > 3.9.x, it wasn't. > > I think we should go with: > - Add tiff_4.0.0beta6.bb which should be compatible with beta5 and will get > upgrades right. > - Add tiff_3.9.4.bb as well, in case someone wants to stay on the released > line. > > Anyone see a problem with that? >
Fine with me. I made the PV after discussion on ML or irc. People told me that as it was a beta I could not call the recipe 4.0.0. This is the commit log: commit c860f51f04d41680100a7fecd2341ecf8f657fe1 Author: Frans Meulenbroeks <[email protected]> Date: Thu Mar 11 21:08:45 2010 +0100 tiff: moved to 4.0.0 beta5 also renamed to 3.9.2 as that is the latest version before 4.0.0 Frans. _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
