2010/10/9 Koen Kooi <[email protected]>: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 09-10-10 00:58, Khem Raj wrote: >> On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 1:23 PM, Frans Meulenbroeks >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Dear all, >>> >>> as a test I decided to run recipe_sanity on our tree, and here are the >>> results >>> There are 1801 warnings: >> >> >> interesting data >> >>> >>> 954 candidate for removal of S >>> 373 LICENSE should be defined to something other than default (unknown) >> >> this should be fixed first. > > Speaking about licenses, we should make recipe sanity complain about > LICENSE = "GPL" as well, since it's important to know wether it's GPLv1, > GPLv2 or GPLv2 (and their "or later" cousins). > > regards, > > Koen
True. This is an interesting challenge though: fr...@linux-suse:~/oe/openembedded/recipes> grep "\"GPL\"" */* |wc 1938 5716 87234 They are all LICENSE strings of the format LICENSE = "GPL". I'm starting to think more and more that it might be useful to define a kind of standard (or minimal requirement or so) for recipes, and that we should identify these one way or another (e.g. because they are in a separate dir, or have a header fiield or so). Frans _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
