Am Montag, den 11.10.2010, 22:52 +0200 schrieb Frans Meulenbroeks: > 2010/10/11 Andreas Mueller <[email protected]>: > > * 'bitbake gedit' on clean system failed during > > * configure: missing enchant > > * compile: gedit.xml unknown "element article" > > > > Signed-off-by: Andreas Mueller <[email protected]> > > --- > > recipes/gnome/gedit_2.30.0.bb | 2 +- > > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/recipes/gnome/gedit_2.30.0.bb b/recipes/gnome/gedit_2.30.0.bb > > index 83dffcf..4ab204c 100644 > > --- a/recipes/gnome/gedit_2.30.0.bb > > +++ b/recipes/gnome/gedit_2.30.0.bb > > @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ DESCRIPTION = "GNOME editor" > > SECTION = "x11/gnome" > > LICENSE = "GPL" > > > > -DEPENDS = "iso-codes gnome-common glib-2.0 gtk+ gconf gtksourceview2" > > +DEPENDS = "iso-codes gnome-common glib-2.0 gtk+ gconf gtksourceview2 > > enchant gnome-doc-utils-native" > > RDEPENDS_${PN} += " gtksourceview2" > > PR = "r2" > > > > > I can understand from your commit message why you add enchant to > DEPENDS, however it is not really clear why gnome-doc-utils-native is > added. Is this because of the gedit.xml unknown? > Can you clarify this in the commit message?
I resent this series [1–4]. I tried to keep the meta data intact, but Andreas it would be nice if you could check again. Thanks, Paul [1] http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/3217/ [2] http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/3218/ [3] http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/3219/ [4] http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/3220/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
