Hello developers, I'm sending an updated patch to fix a conflict with today's master branch.
It would be nice to receive some more comments on this patch and on the patches I sent earlier. I've created a bundle in patchwork which includes all pending patches by the opendreambox project: http://patchwork.openembedded.org/bundle/obi/opendreambox/ Those patches are also available from a git repository which gets rebased from time to time: http://git.opendreambox.org/?p=obi/openembedded.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/for-upstream All patches were ported from the opendreambox distribution to OE's master. They were tested on 32-bit mipsel machines. However, runtime tests were only done with a slightly older version of OE. Ultimately, I'd like to merge our distribution into master. To accomplish that, I'm submitting those patches first, that don't depend on any distribution or machine. Speaking of that, our distribution currently contains quite some lines like this (from gst-plugins.inc) EXTRA_OECONF_append_opendreambox = "--disable-x" or patches like this (from dbus.inc): -DEPENDS = "expat glib-2.0 virtual/libintl libsm libice virtual/libx11" +DEPENDS = "expat glib-2.0 virtual/libintl" +DEPENDS += "$...@base_contains('DISTRO_FEATURES', 'no-x11', '', 'libsm libice virtual/libx11', d)}" I believe that no-x11 doesn't sound like a nice feature, so it should better be inversed to read x11. This, however, would require to specify this feature in every distribution supporting x11. Will such a change possibly get accepted? Can a feature get enabled by default but disabled selectively by a distribution? Does the majority of distributions run with or without support for X11? Regards, Andreas Andreas Oberritter (1): module.bbclass: fix dependency on specific kernel classes/module.bbclass | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
