On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 1:36 PM, Maupin, Chase <[email protected]> wrote:
> > -----Original Message----- > > From: Chase Maupin [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Friday, October 15, 2010 3:32 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Cc: Maupin, Chase > > Subject: [PATCH 2/2] Fix class OVERRIDES order > > > > * Changed the OVERRIDES settings in the classes to use the new > > ordering. > > > > Signed-off-by: Chase Maupin <[email protected]> > > I was a little unsure of these which is why I put them in a separate patch. > Should the virtclass overrides be high or low priority? Please feel free > to correct me, but I wanted to make sure that we didn't override "local" I personally think low is best, otherwise virtclass-native would override, say, something specific to a certain architecture -- but architecture specifics still apply to a native recipe, as we are still building for that architecture. Others may disagree, though, and I'm certainly open to alternative views on the subject. -- Christopher Larson clarson at kergoth dot com Founder - BitBake, OpenEmbedded, OpenZaurus Maintainer - Tslib Senior Software Engineer, Mentor Graphics _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
