On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 12:25 PM, Frans Meulenbroeks <[email protected]> wrote: > 2010/10/16 Khem Raj <[email protected]>: >> On (16/10/10 13:56), Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: >>> Signed-off-by: Frans Meulenbroeks <[email protected]> >> >> Good job Frans. I knew this was better solution but chose the inferior one >> as it was easy but this one is more elegant and libtool version >> agnostic. Thanks for doing it. In fact this should be how we solve libtool >> update issues w.r.t. libtool 2.4 as we go forward >> >> Acked-by: Khem Raj <[email protected]> > > Thanks for the ack, but the credits should go to Henning. He did put > me on this track and I used his patch as example. > Couldn't have done it alone, being the auto* and libtool n00b that I am. > It was solely because I could stand on the shoulders of a giant, that > I could produce this. > > BTW: the following recipes seem good candidates for doing the same > sort of patch: > ./binutils/binutils-2.20.1/libtool-2.4-update.patch
we do not reconfigure binutils as it needs specific versions of autotools so it may be needed > ./gnuradio/gnuradio/libusb-libtool-2.4-update.patch I am expecting Philip to commit his gnuradio rework soon and then this patch will not be needed anymore > ./libsdl/libsdl-x11-1.2.14/libtool-update.patch this could be looked at. > > I would prefer it if the recipe maintainer gives this a stab. > > BTW, maybe a better solution would be do do this in autotools (we also > discussed this in irc) and allow for aon overridable directory > variable (with default value m4) > I feel not comfortable enough to author such a patch though. > Note also that gnutls has three dirs with generated m4 files. > > Frans > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel > _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
