2010/10/18 Koen Kooi <[email protected]>: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 18-10-10 15:38, Ulf Samuelsson wrote: >> Marcin Juszkiewicz skrev: >>> Dnia sobota, 16 października 2010 o 14:50:02 [email protected] >>> napisał(a): >>> >>>> +++ b/conf/machine/include/at91-2.6.30.inc >>>> +++ b/conf/machine/include/at91-2.6.32.inc >>> >>> Do you plan to duplicate that file with each kernel you will produce? >>> Create include/at91-sam9.inc and put it there. >>> >>> Regards, >> >> This is to allow different kernel versions for different AT91 chips. >> This allows both a "stable" version, and a development kernel >> to be easily handled. >> >> The file defines (amongst other things) the >> * kernel version, >> * u-boot version >> * at91bootstrap version >> so you need one file per version. > > NAK! Machines don't get to decide versions! Please revert that commit > and come up with a better way, e.g. default_preference in the recipes or > distro include files.
Well machines are probably better capable to decide what u-boot and kernel version is best for them. One alternative (which is probably by more yukky) is to create an kernel-at91 recipe and define PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/kernel I don't feel that is a better scenario Frans > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) > > iD8DBQFMvGmSMkyGM64RGpERAoEpAJwP7tGmHa9mq3bUhbc0WKfwRWJETgCgrd3l > 3rfyCWSdNXlK4lIbgpZLMBA= > =2WQm > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel > _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
